[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Testbed-admins] query regarding MIB compatibility with the experiment switch



Hello,

We had the same problem with our Cisco 4006/4506 switches which didnt have support for the STACK-MIB.
One option is to check whether newer version of the switch IOS software has support for those MIBs. If so, you can
upgrade the IOS and it should work.
If not (in our case), we commented out the code in the emulab software which did the port control.
The only disadvantage is that you cannot control the port speeds of the switch or NICs and you are stuck at a certain
speed (1Gbps or 100Mbps depending on your switches/NICs). You will have to manually set the port speeds to
the value from the console.

Utah folks: Maybe there should be some code to check whether switches support the MIBs and if not it would neuter
the port control code?

HTH,
Adit

Mohammed Azad wrote:
Hello Mr Ricci,
First of all, thanks for your precious feedback.I found the OIDs that are used in emulab source code.But I am struck with the issue of porting those OIDs. My confusion is that- a particular OID belongs to a particular MIB and do a particular job.So is there any other way that there may be another OID of another MIB that performs the same job as the previous OID and I should replace the OIDs of some absent MIB with the OID of present MIB? Would you kindly advice me whether my understanding is correct or not? Or should I go for adding those missing MIBs in N5000? (actually the problem with this alternative is that I cannot find a way to add MIB to cisco switch.I found the way to add MIB to NMS pc, but not to the switch). I am sorry if I am too naive in asking these questions.

Azad

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Robert P Ricci <ricci@cs.utah.edu> wrote:
Unfortunately, despite their names, the STACK and VTP MIBs do provide
functionality that we use on single switches, so they are needed even if
you have one switch. I don't think that any of the MIBs we use are
required only for multi-switch setups.

Thus spake Mohammed Azad on Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:17:06AM -0500:
> Hello,Thanks a lot for your kind feedback.I was searching for the OIDs that
> are used in the code.I found a lot and will try to substitute them. Now I am
> thinking another point. We will use only one experimental switch for the 1st
> phase of our implementation. So as there are not more than one experimental
> switch, will VTP & stacking will be used? My understanding was those 2 MIB
> i.e. 'CISCO-VTP-MIB', and 'CISCO-STACK-MIB' is used for
> communicating/integration among the switches. So if we do not have more than
> one experimental switch, should it harm building our testbed if that N5000
> experimental switch do not have those 2 MIBs i.e. 'CISCO-VTP-MIB', and
> 'CISCO-STACK-MIB'

--
/-----------------------------------------------------------
| Robert P Ricci <ricci@cs.utah.edu> | <ricci@flux.utah.edu>
| Research Associate, University of Utah Flux Group
| www.flux.utah.edu | www.emulab.net
\-----------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________ Testbed-admins mailing list Testbed-admins@flux.utah.edu http://www.flux.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/testbed-admins