[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Testbed-admins] query regarding MIB compatibility with the experiment switch
- To: Mohammed Azad <mazad1@tigers.lsu.edu>
- From: Robert P Ricci <ricci@cs.utah.edu>
- Subject: Re: [Testbed-admins] query regarding MIB compatibility with the experiment switch
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 12:32:19 -0600
Unfortunately, despite their names, the STACK and VTP MIBs do provide
functionality that we use on single switches, so they are needed even if
you have one switch. I don't think that any of the MIBs we use are
required only for multi-switch setups.
Thus spake Mohammed Azad on Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 11:17:06AM -0500:
> Hello,Thanks a lot for your kind feedback.I was searching for the OIDs that
> are used in the code.I found a lot and will try to substitute them. Now I am
> thinking another point. We will use only one experimental switch for the 1st
> phase of our implementation. So as there are not more than one experimental
> switch, will VTP & stacking will be used? My understanding was those 2 MIB
> i.e. 'CISCO-VTP-MIB', and 'CISCO-STACK-MIB' is used for
> communicating/integration among the switches. So if we do not have more than
> one experimental switch, should it harm building our testbed if that N5000
> experimental switch do not have those 2 MIBs i.e. 'CISCO-VTP-MIB', and
> 'CISCO-STACK-MIB'
--
/-----------------------------------------------------------
| Robert P Ricci <ricci@cs.utah.edu> | <ricci@flux.utah.edu>
| Research Associate, University of Utah Flux Group
| www.flux.utah.edu | www.emulab.net
\-----------------------------------------------------------