Re: [Testbed-admins] Problem configuring Cisco switch

["Manuel Requena" <mrequena@cttc.es>]

> 
> > I've been playing with "/usr/testbed/libexec/switchmac" and
> > "/usr/testbed/bin/snmpit" and I think I have to put 10, 11, and 12
> > for 'card2' field for data interfaces. But card2='3' for control
> > interface. Why?  Any other idea?
> 
> Could you send the output of swichmac so we can look at it?  Also,
> before you can use switchmac, you need to have traffic going out on
> all the interfaces, which is what the newnode MFS does. How are you
> arranging for the traffic?
> 

I only show the lines for pc21 and other machines in module #9: 

000eXXXXXX98,cisco6513/0.21,1,pc21:eth2,expt
0009XXXXXX12,cisco6513/9.25,1,unknown,expt
000eXXXXXX88,cisco6513/1.21,1,pc21:eth3,expt
0002XXXXXX6f,cisco6513/3.21,1,pc21:eth0,expt
0009XXXXXX99,cisco6513/9.26,1,unknown,expt
0002XXXXXX6e,cisco6513/2.21,1,pc21:eth1,expt

According to the code, the output is:
<mac>,<switch>/<module>.<port>,<vlan>,<interface>,<class>

So, pc21:eth0 is in module #3, but in fact, it is in physical module #13
pc21:eth1 is in module #2, but in fact, it is in physical module #12
pc21:eth2 is in module #0, but in fact, it is in physical module #10
pc21:eth3 is in module #1, but in fact, it is in physical module #11

In line 2, you can see a mac in module #9, and it is. The same for line 5.

Why sometimes you can find the real module and sometimes you can find a
"virtual" one? What I have to put in 'wires' table?

For the traffic, I set a 1-node experiment and I use arping over all the
interfaces.

Manuel