[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[csmith-dev] c++11

To: Csmith Dev Mailing List <csmith-dev@flux.utah.edu>
Subject: [csmith-dev] c++11
From: John Regehr <regehr@cs.utah.edu>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 10:12:49 +0200
List-archive: </listarchives/csmith-dev>
List-help: <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=help>
List-id: Csmith Development Mailing List <csmith-dev.flux.utah.edu>
List-post: <mailto:csmith-dev@flux.utah.edu>
List-subscribe: <http://www.flux.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/csmith-dev>, <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.flux.utah.edu/mailman/options/csmith-dev>, <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1

Hi folks, is there a reason we shouldn't start allowing C++11 in Csmith?Recent versions of GCC, Clang, and MSVC++ appear to support everyC++11 feature we might conceivably want.


John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [csmith-dev] c++11
  - From: Alastair Donaldson <alastair.donaldson@imperial.ac.uk>
- Re: [csmith-dev] c++11
  - From: Eric Eide <eeide@cs.utah.edu>
- Re: [csmith-dev] c++11
  - From: Daniel Dickman <didickman@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [csmith-dev] Variable Names in the Comments of Function Definitions
Next by Date: Re: [csmith-dev] c++11
Previous by thread: Re: [csmith-dev] Variable Names in the Comments of Function Definitions
Next by thread: Re: [csmith-dev] c++11
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread