[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield

To: John Regehr <regehr@cs.utah.edu>
Subject: Re: [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield
From: Pascal Cuoq <pascal.cuoq@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:46:23 +0200
Cc: "Paulo J. Matos" <Paulo.Matos@csr.com>, csmith-dev@flux.utah.edu
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108160636590.2390@gamow.cs.utah.edu>
List-archive: </listarchives/csmith-dev>
List-help: <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=help>
List-id: Csmith Development Mailing List <csmith-dev.flux.utah.edu>
List-post: <mailto:csmith-dev@flux.utah.edu>
List-subscribe: <http://www.flux.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/csmith-dev>, <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.flux.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/csmith-dev>, <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4E4A46B5.8010203@csr.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108160636590.2390@gamow.cs.utah.edu>

Hello,

John wrote:

> They are permitted [...]

perhaps Paulo was alluding to the sentence "If the value is zero,

the declaration shall have no declarator" in 6.7.2.1 paragraph 3 of C99.

Pascal

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield
  - From: Derek M Jones <derek@knosof.co.uk>

References:
- [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield
  - From: "Paulo J. Matos" <Paulo.Matos@csr.com>
- Re: [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield
  - From: John Regehr <regehr@cs.utah.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield
Next by Date: Re: [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield
Previous by thread: Re: [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield
Next by thread: Re: [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread