Re: [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield

To: "Paulo J. Matos" <Paulo.Matos@csr.com>
Subject: Re: [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield
From: John Regehr <regehr@cs.utah.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 06:38:51 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: csmith-dev@flux.utah.edu
In-reply-to: <4E4A46B5.8010203@csr.com>
List-archive: </listarchives/csmith-dev>
List-help: <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=help>
List-id: Csmith Development Mailing List <csmith-dev.flux.utah.edu>
List-post: <mailto:csmith-dev@flux.utah.edu>
List-subscribe: <http://www.flux.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/csmith-dev>, <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.flux.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/csmith-dev>, <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4E4A46B5.8010203@csr.com>
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)

Hi Paulo,

As far as I know 0-width named bitfields are not allowed, but they are being

They are permitted and basically mean "stop adding bitfields to thecurrent int-sized allocation unit and move on to the next one."


John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield
  - From: Pascal Cuoq <pascal.cuoq@gmail.com>

References:
- [csmith-dev] 0-width named bitfield
  - From: "Paulo J. Matos" <Paulo.Matos@csr.com>