[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [csmith-dev] Pragma pack clang/gcc difference

To: csmith-dev@flux.utah.edu
Subject: Re: [csmith-dev] Pragma pack clang/gcc difference
From: John Regehr <regehr@cs.utah.edu>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:00:39 -0600
In-reply-to: <017c01cc5ab2$0039ac80$00ad0580$@utah.edu>
List-archive: </listarchives/csmith-dev>
List-help: <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=help>
List-id: Csmith Development Mailing List <csmith-dev.flux.utah.edu>
List-post: <mailto:csmith-dev@flux.utah.edu>
List-subscribe: <http://www.flux.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/csmith-dev>, <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.flux.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/csmith-dev>, <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAOH62JiatpCBK_JO5EJzAL-ZMih_aRiELe1TeMhjDT=gOLQ6Kg@mail.gmail.com> <017c01cc5ab2$0039ac80$00ad0580$@utah.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0

Clang and GCC have different layouts when using #pragma pack
together with size 0 bitfields!

This is interesting. I wonder if it's intended, a bug, or justsomething that nobody cares about?


John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [csmith-dev] Pragma pack clang/gcc difference
  - From: Pascal Cuoq <pascal.cuoq@gmail.com>

References:
- [csmith-dev] Pragma pack clang/gcc difference
  - From: Pascal Cuoq <pascal.cuoq@gmail.com>
- Re: [csmith-dev] Pragma pack clang/gcc difference
  - From: "Xuejun Yang" <jxyang@cs.utah.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [csmith-dev] Char pointers in Unions
Next by Date: Re: [csmith-dev] Pragma pack clang/gcc difference
Previous by thread: Re: [csmith-dev] Pragma pack clang/gcc difference
Next by thread: Re: [csmith-dev] Pragma pack clang/gcc difference
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread