[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [creduce-dev] unifdef
Well, I probably did something wrong but using this interestingness test:
g++ -c -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only incremental_components.cpp -w &&
! clang++ -c -std=c++11 -fsyntax-only incremental_components.cpp -w
C-Reduce rather quickly came up with this:
constexpr int x0() { return __builtin_tanhl(0); }
Do you have a better interestingness test for me? Should I be looking
for a specific error message from clang++ I guess?
John