[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Haus-Great news
We are home from the Neuro consult and it seams as though the FCE diagnosis
is most probable and we are on the road to recovery. With the improvements
Haus has made everyone is encouraged and a complete recovery is quite
possible. So what is FCE? Here you go:
But first I want to tell you all he really is improving. He walked up the
ramp when we got home into the house. :-))) And jumped up onto the couch
as to say gee it's good to be home.... Amazing and yes very encouraging
Fibrocartilaginous Infarction: Compliments of: Dr. Clemmons
<http://pawcare.com/rclemmons/para.htm>
Even though animals do not suffer from the same degree of vascular disease
as human beings, infarction of the spinal cord with fibrocartilaginous
material is not uncommon. It occurs in any breed of dogs, but is most
common in large breeds, such as Great Danes, Labrador retrievers and German
Shepherds. Although both arteries and veins can be affected, most commonly
it is the venous system of the spinal cord which is obstructed, leading to
a hemorrhagic infarction. It is believed that herniation of the nucleus
pulposus takes place either into the vertebral body or the venous sinuses
within the spinal column. Since the vertebral body represents a vascular
space communicating with the spinal venous system, the material gains
access to the spinal veins. These veins do not have valves, allowing the
fibrocartilaginous material to flow up and down the spinal column. When
intra-thoracic pressure increases, this material can be back-flushed into
small penetrating spinal cord veins. When the intra-thoracic pressure
returns to normal, the veins collapse trapping the material and leading to
excessive venous pressure upstream to the occlusion. The venules rupture
leading to a hemorrhagic infarction. The pattern of infarction usually
affects a quadrant of the spinal cord, although initial signs may affect
more of the spinal pathways due to inflammation and spinal cord swelling.
The infarction can occur anywhere along the spinal cord, but the causal
cervical and mid- to lower lumbar spinal cord segments appear to be most
frequently involved.
The presence of spinal cord infarction should be suspected whenever a
patient presents with acute onset of paresis or paralysis which is markedly
asymmetrical and there is no evidence of hyperpathia. Vascular disease is
generally acute and non-progressive. In addition, the spinal cord contains
pain pathways, but no pain receptors. As such, strict diseases within the
spinal cord without meningeal involvement are usually not painful. Most of
the other diagnostic tests will be within normal limits. Occasionally,
there will be evidence of hemorrhage on CSF analysis. Spinal radiographs,
do not demonstrate the disease, but may reveal other evidence of spinal
column degeneration. Myelography will be normal or demonstrate mild
intramedullary swelling. In a small number of cases (where the vascular
occlusion is secondary to a systemic disease), the minimum data base will
show evidence of the systemic disease.
The treatment of spinal cord infarction is that for acute spinal cord
injury, using methylprednisolone at 30 mg/kg initially. This is followed by
15 mg/kg every 8 hours for the first 24-48 hours. Then, oral prednisolone
is begun at 0.5 mg /kg every 12 hours for 5 days. I continue prednisolone
at 0.5 mg/kg every other day, in the morning, for up to another 2 weeks.
Many cases will improve dramatically within the first week, although they
will still improve over several months. If there has been no improvement in
the first week, re-examination and additional tests may be indicated. Since
usually only a quadrant of the spinal cord is affected, the patient will
improve most on the unaffected side. Reorganization will usually allow
these patients to function adequately. Spinal cord infarction from
fibrocartilaginous material is a sporadic problem and, usually, does not
reoccur.