[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[csmith-dev] csmith 2.1 plan

To: csmith-dev@flux.utah.edu
Subject: [csmith-dev] csmith 2.1 plan
From: John Regehr <regehr@cs.utah.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:25:02 -0600
List-archive: </listarchives/csmith-dev>
List-help: <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=help>
List-id: Csmith Development Mailing List <csmith-dev.flux.utah.edu>
List-post: <mailto:csmith-dev@flux.utah.edu>
List-subscribe: <http://www.flux.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/csmith-dev>, <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.flux.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/csmith-dev>, <mailto:csmith-dev-request@flux.utah.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11

Xuejun and I were just chatting and we think that Csmith is pretty muchfeature-complete for 2.1. Certainly there's a lot of great stuff since2.0. Probably a few more weeks of fixing bugs and we'll be ready torelease it...


John

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [csmith-dev] csmith 2.1 plan
  - From: Eric Eide <eeide@cs.utah.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [csmith-dev] Unions, bitfields, and reading bits that have not been initialized
Next by Date: Re: [csmith-dev] csmith 2.1 plan
Previous by thread: Re: [csmith-dev] frama-c blog post about csmith
Next by thread: Re: [csmith-dev] csmith 2.1 plan
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread