Re: [csmith-project/csmith] faf05b: Removed a dispeared clang crash bug and added one ...

[John Regehr <regehr@cs.utah.edu>]

Right, it comes down to a bug ever being reproduced by someone else. 
When that doesn't happen, I tend to not include it.

John


On 11/08/2011 09:08 AM, Yang Chen wrote:
> On 11/8/11 6:01 AM, Eric Eide wrote:
> > Yang> Commit: faf05b1f8dda1aeee0f82f04777baec1e5f42ed5
> > Yang> Author: Yang Chen<chenyang@cs.utah.edu>
> > Yang> Date: 2011-11-07 (Mon, 07 Nov 2011)
> > Yang>
> > Yang> Changed paths:
> > Yang> M BUGS_REPORTED.TXT
> > Yang>
> > Yang> Log Message:
> > Yang> -----------
> > Yang> Removed a dispeared clang crash bug and added one more gcc
> > Yang> wrong code bug
> >
> > "Disappeared": you mean that it was fixed? Those shouldn't be removed,
> > I don't
> > think.
>
> Sorry I should've made more clear message. It's a sort of transient bug.
> It was there when John reported, but gone later (Neither John nor LLVM
> people could reproduce it in a slightly new version).
>
> > Actually, I'm not sure than any bug from this list should be removed,
> > ever.
> > Reported means reported, independent of the outcome.
> >
> > Yes?
>
> Maybe we should only keep those reproducible or confirmed bugs?
>
> - Yang
>
> > Eric.